SSS

Math & Statistics

Sample Size Step-by-Step Calculator

Derive a sample size for estimating a population mean from a pilot standard deviation, confidence level, target half-width, finite population, design effect, and planned attrition, with each rounding decision exposed.

z critical-
Precision ratio z·s / E-
Uncorrected n0-
Finite-population n-
Design-adjusted completes-
Recruitment target-
Rounded-plan half-width-
Rounding reserve-

ROUNDING-AWARE DERIVATION

Every transformation from pilot variability to recruitment target

A calculation staircase shows the unrounded values and ceiling operations; a precision rail checks the achieved half-width after rounding.

Every transformation from pilot variability to recruitment targetUpdates with every input

PILOT-SD STRESS TEST

Sample size under alternative variability assumptions

The target half-width is fixed while pilot SD is perturbed to reveal the square-law sensitivity.

Live analysis based on the current calculator inputs
Pilot SDUncorrected n0Finite nDesign completesRecruit targetAchieved half-width

PILOT EVIDENCE

Use a variability estimate that represents the planned measurement

  1. Define the mean and measurement unit.
  2. Use a pilot SD from a comparable population and protocol.
  3. Choose half-width in practical units.
  4. Apply design effect only when the sampling design warrants it.
  5. Round completed observations before grossing up attrition.

SQUARE-LAW SENSITIVITY

A small SD or precision change can move n sharply

Because n0 contains the squared ratio s/E, doubling the SD or halving the target half-width roughly quadruples the uncorrected sample.

Pilot SD uncertainty therefore deserves a scenario table rather than a single overly precise recruitment number.

MEAN-PRECISION DERIVATION

Square the signal-to-precision ratio, then apply planning corrections

The normal approximation converts pilot variability into a continuous n. Finite correction, design effect, and attrition are applied in sequence, with upward rounding only where people or units are counted.

Detailed calculation process and general formulas

n0 = (z s / E)^2nF = n0 N / (N + n0 - 1)nD = ceil(DEFF x nF)nR = ceil(nD / (1-a))E_achieved = z s sqrt[(N-nD)/(nD(N-1))]

Symbols, meanings, and units

s
pilot estimate of population SDoutcome units
E
target confidence-interval half-widthoutcome units
n0
large-population continuous sample sizeobservations
a
unusable or attrition fractiondecimal
E_achieved
approximate half-width after roundingoutcome units

ROUNDING CONTROL

Upward rounding is part of the design, not formatting

Each integer boundary protects the target differently.

Continuous core

-

Keep n0 and nF unrounded for the next calculation.

Completed observations

-

Ceiling after design effect preserves analytic precision.

Recruitment reserve

-

Attrition gross-up protects usable completes but does not improve their variance.

Decision takeaway: Archive the pilot SD source, unrounded intermediates, and the final ceiling operations.

Applied decisions

Mean-estimation planning cases

Laboratory precision study

A pilot SD estimates assay variability and the study requires a four-unit half-width.

What the result clarifies: The stress table shows the recruitment cost of a noisier production environment.

Finite employee census frame

A bounded workforce is sampled for a mean score.

What the result clarifies: Finite correction becomes visible when the target sample is a meaningful share of the frame.

Worked current scenario

Substitution, intermediate values, and reconciliation

Method references

Sources for this calculator's specific method

Scope and limitations

This planning approximation uses a normal critical value and a pilot SD. Small-sample t iteration, nonnormal outcomes, repeated measures, unequal allocation, clustering beyond a scalar design effect, subgroup targets, and missing-not-at-random attrition require a tailored design.

Sample Size Step-by-Step Calculator | Mean Precision with Pilot SD FAQ

Why use a pilot SD rather than the range?

The formula is variance-based; a range-to-SD conversion adds assumptions and is unstable in small pilots.

Why not round n0 immediately?

Early rounding can compound across finite correction and design inflation.

Does recruiting extra people always improve precision?

Only usable completed observations contribute to the modeled precision.