Value asymmetry
A large payoff gap amplifies both expected upside and random batch-to-batch spread; probability and economics cannot be reviewed separately.
Probability
Combine a finite binomial event count with success value, failure value, and one fixed cost to obtain expected net value, outcome spread, and break-even success probability.
FINITE-TRIAL VALUE MODEL
The model keeps success payoff, failure payoff, and batch cost explicit, then uses linearity of expectation to value the entire opportunity set and solve the probability needed to break even.
LIVE DECISION RECORD
Success, failure, and fixed-cost layers remain separate before the expected net is reconciled.
| Value layer | Expected count | Value per occurrence | Expected contribution | Calculation basis |
|---|
CURRENT CALCULATION PROCESS
E[V]=npv_s+n(1-p)v_f-F; sigma_V=|v_s-v_f|sqrt(np(1-p)); p_BE=(F/n-v_f)/(v_s-v_f)
| Symbol | Meaning and unit | Current value |
|---|---|---|
| trials | Trial count - Number of repeated opportunities in the decision batch. | 500 |
| successProbabilityPct | Success probability per trial (%) - Stable probability of the payoff labeled success. | 18 |
| successValue | Value per success - Signed contribution from one success outcome. | 95 |
| failureValue | Value per failure - Signed contribution or loss from one failure outcome. | -14 |
| fixedCost | Fixed batch cost - One-time cost deducted after outcome expectation. | 6000 |
Waiting for valid inputs.
WHO THIS MODEL SERVES
Primary audience: Product, campaign, portfolio, operations, and experiment teams valuing repeated binary opportunities.
Decision boundary: Use for one stable event probability, two linear per-trial values, and one known batch cost; it does not model nonlinear capacity, learning, or correlated outcomes.
HOW TO BUILD THE VALUE CASE
EXPECTED-VALUE FUNDAMENTALS
FORMULA AND DEFAULT SUBSTITUTION
With n=500 and p=0.18, expected successes are 90 and expected failures 410. Outcome value is 90 x 95+410 x (-14)=2,810; deducting 6,000 gives -3,190. Break-even p solves 500[p x 95+(1-p) x (-14)]-6,000=0.
DEEPER VALUE ANALYSIS
A large payoff gap amplifies both expected upside and random batch-to-batch spread; probability and economics cannot be reviewed separately.
More trials spread a fixed commitment across opportunities, but only if the per-trial model remains stable at that scale.
The calculation treats p as known. A decision should test plausible p values or retain an interval before calling the mean investable.
WORKED VALUE CASES
Five hundred contacts at an 18% save rate, +95 per save, -14 per non-save, and 6,000 setup cost produce a negative expected net. The break-even p identifies the evidence threshold for launching.
If success and failure are both worth 20, changing p cannot affect value. Rejecting the break-even request prevents a meaningless division by zero.
VALUE TERMINOLOGY
EVIDENCE RETENTION
Retain cohort definition, probability estimate period, success/failure accounting, variable-cost treatment, fixed-cost approval, currency, and decision horizon. Preserve sensitivity cases when p is uncertain.
LIMITS AND EXCLUSIONS
RELIABLE SOURCES
EVENT-VALUE FAQ
No. It is a long-run probability-weighted average; a single batch can differ materially.
Yes. Enter signed values: revenue or benefit positive, loss or cost negative.
The model treats it as a batch-level commitment. Per-trial costs belong inside both outcome values or an expanded model.
Then probability does not affect value and a break-even p is undefined, so the page rejects that case.
Yes. It means every valid p is profitable or no valid p can break even under the entered payoffs and fixed cost.
No. Fixed cost is treated as known; spread comes only from the random success count.
IMPORTANT VALUE NOTE
Review probability uncertainty, downside capacity, timing, dependencies, and governance constraints. The exported record documents assumptions; it does not authorize spending.