Consequence sensitivity
Hold probabilities fixed and vary the loss consequence using documented low, central, and high cases. The weighted contribution identifies which estimate dominates expected downside.
Probability
Combine explicit win, draw, and loss probabilities with outcome-specific operational consequences to measure expected downside and adverse-event probability.
THREE-OUTCOME CONSEQUENCE RISK
Enter a complete win-draw-loss scenario and a consequence for each state. The model keeps average downside, adverse probability, and probability concentration separate so one headline cannot hide the shape of the risk.
LIVE DECISION RECORD
Each row shows the supplied probability, consequence, weighted contribution, and whether it reaches the current adverse threshold.
| Outcome | Probability | Consequence | Weighted contribution | Threshold status |
|---|
CURRENT CALCULATION PROCESS
E[C] = pW*cW + pD*cD + pL*cL; P(adverse) = sum p_i where c_i >= T
| Symbol | Meaning and unit | Current value |
|---|---|---|
| pW | Win probability, percent | 45 |
| pD | Draw probability, percent | 30 |
| pL | Loss probability, percent | 25 |
| cW | Win consequence, chosen unit | 0 |
| cD | Draw consequence, chosen unit | 20 |
| cL | Loss consequence, chosen unit | 80 |
| T | Adverse consequence threshold | 50 |
Waiting for valid inputs.
DECISION BOUNDARY
This page serves club operations, tournament, travel, staffing, and qualification planning when win, draw, and loss cause different downstream burdens. It accepts scenario probabilities rather than claiming to estimate them, and it never recommends a bet, price, or stake.
FIVE-STEP RISK WORKFLOW
RISK FUNDAMENTALS
FORMULA AND DEFAULT SUBSTITUTION
At a threshold of 50, only the 80-unit loss state is adverse. Therefore `P(adverse) = 0.25 = 25%`. The expectation of 26 and tail probability of 25% answer different questions and should be retained together.
THREE DEEPER RISK MODULES
Hold probabilities fixed and vary the loss consequence using documented low, central, and high cases. The weighted contribution identifies which estimate dominates expected downside.
A threshold should come from an escalation policy, staffing trigger, or qualification rule. If it is chosen after results appear, adverse probability becomes vulnerable to motivated reclassification.
Entropy can be high even when the scenario is well calibrated, or low when it is overconfident. Retain model date, data window, and analyst owner with the entered probabilities.
TWO OPERATIONAL CASES
A draw creates 20 units of rescheduling work and a loss creates 80. The 26-unit expectation supports average resource planning, while the 25% adverse probability supports whether to reserve an escalation team.
Every nonnegative consequence meets a zero threshold, so adverse probability is 100%. That is mathematically correct but usually signals that the policy boundary is too broad to distinguish escalation states.
MATCH RISK GLOSSARY
LIMITS, DISCLAIMER, AND EVIDENCE
Evidence to retain: probability source and timestamp, scenario owner, consequence worksheet, threshold authority, selected unit, and exported contribution table. Reapprove the scenario after lineup, venue, format, or operational-impact changes.
RELIABLE SOURCES
MATCH OUTCOME RISK FAQ
Use one consistent unit across all three outcomes, such as lost points, staff hours, travel cost, or a documented internal impact score. The calculator does not convert between units.
Win, draw, and loss are modeled as mutually exclusive and exhaustive. A missing or duplicated probability would make both expected consequence and adverse probability incoherent.
It labels every outcome whose entered consequence is at least the threshold, then sums those outcome probabilities. It does not change expected consequence.
Expectation averages all outcomes. A severe but less likely loss can create material tail risk even when the probability-weighted average remains below the threshold.
It describes how dispersed the supplied probabilities are across three outcomes. Near zero means concentrated in one outcome; near one means comparatively even, not necessarily safer.
No. It is intentionally framed around operational consequences and omits price, bankroll, utility, market efficiency, and responsible-gambling safeguards.
IMPORTANT RISK NOTE
Two scenarios can have the same expected consequence and radically different tail behavior. Preserve the three probability-consequence pairs and the adverse threshold instead of circulating only one average.