p

Physics and electromagnetism

Electromagnetic Wave Scenario Calculator

Compare received power for two far-field line-of-sight free-space radio scenarios using frequency, distance, antenna gains, and explicit additional losses.

Two-scenario electromagnetic link budget

Compare two free-space links without hiding distance or loss assumptions

This page compares two ideal far-field, matched-polarization line-of-sight links with the Friis relation expressed as a dB budget. Scenario means a concrete distance and added-loss case, not a generic score or probability.

Scenario A received power-
Scenario B received power-
B minus A-
B/A power ratio-

Current model evidence

Two-link budget comparison

Keep free-space spreading and user-specified additional losses visible for both links.

Editorial landscape comparing a short clear radio link with a longer partially obstructed link between antennas
Distance sets free-space spreading; obstacles and hardware losses are separate entries rather than hidden inside the same term.
Received power versus distance for both loss assumptionsEach curve holds frequency, antenna gains, and its entered extra loss fixed; markers identify the two selected distances.
Two-link budget comparisonCurrent unrounded calculation path
Keep free-space spreading and user-specified additional losses visible for both links.
ScenarioDistance or ratioFSPL or delta (dB)Extra loss or delta (dB)Received power or delta (dBm/dB)Linear power or ratio

DETAILED CALCULATION PROCESS

Formula, units, default substitution, and reconciliation

1. Governing relation

lambda = c/f; FSPL = 20 log10(4 pi r/lambda); P_r(dBm) = P_t(dBm) + G_t + G_r - FSPL - L_extra

The Friis free-space relation is evaluated in logarithmic form. Distance and wavelength determine FSPL, while antenna gains and explicitly entered non-free-space losses complete each link budget.

2. Symbols and default basis

SymbolMeaningUnitDefault basis
P_tPower at transmit antenna inputW or dBm1 W = 30 dBm
f, lambdaCarrier frequency and vacuum wavelengthHz; m2400 MHz
G_t, G_rDirectional antenna gainsdBi2 dBi each
r_A, r_BFar-field path lengthsm10 m; 100 m
FSPLFree-space path lossdBcalculated separately
L_extraLoss beyond free-space spreadingdB0 dB; 6 dB
P_rPower at receive antenna output referencedBmcalculated

3. Unit and sign normalization

  • Megahertz are multiplied by 1e6 before lambda = c/f.
  • Watts convert to dBm with 10 log10(1000 P_W).
  • dB gains and losses add algebraically; convert a dB difference to a power ratio with 10^(Delta/10).

4. Current numerical substitution

    5. Independent reconciliation

    HOW TO USE THIS CALCULATOR

    Five steps from physical inputs to a defensible result

    1. Use transmitter power at the antenna reference plane after upstream feeder loss unless that loss is entered explicitly.
    2. Enter the shared carrier frequency and gains in the actual link directions.
    3. Set Scenario A as the reference distance and document any losses beyond free-space spreading.
    4. Enter Scenario B distance and its own obstruction, cable, polarization, or radome loss allowance.
    5. Compare dBm and linear ratio, then test receiver sensitivity and fade margin outside this calculator.

    PHYSICS FOUNDATIONS FOR THIS MODEL

    Concepts that control this specific calculation

    Free-space loss is geometric spreading
    It increases with both distance and frequency for antennas specified by gain.
    dBi is directional gain
    Antenna gain redistributes radiated power; it is not added watts.
    dBm is absolute power
    Unlike dB, dBm has a one-milliwatt reference and can be converted to milliwatts.
    Additional loss needs provenance
    Cable, polarization, rain, walls, foliage, and mismatch should not be silently folded into FSPL.
    Friis has a domain
    The classical form assumes far-field line of sight, matched polarization, and compatible reference planes.

    DEEP ANALYSIS 1

    A tenfold distance increase costs 20 dB

    With frequency and other terms fixed, received power follows 1/r^2, so a distance ratio of ten produces a 100-fold power reduction.

    DEEP ANALYSIS 2

    Frequency comparisons depend on antenna description

    At fixed dBi gains, higher frequency increases FSPL. At fixed physical apertures, gain may rise with frequency, changing the comparison.

    DEEP ANALYSIS 3

    Received power is not reliability

    Sensitivity, required SNR, noise bandwidth, modulation, interference, fading, availability target, and regulatory power limits remain separate decisions.

    RESULT INTERPRETATION

    What the current output does and does not decide

    A negative B-minus-A value means Scenario B receives less power. The ratio is always positive and is the linear counterpart of that dB change.

    If both scenarios are identical, zero dB and a ratio of one are the correct boundary. Very short distances may violate far-field assumptions even though the formula returns a number.

    REAL USE CASES

    Two decisions with different boundary conditions

    Warehouse sensor relocation

    A 2.4 GHz sensor moves from 10 m clear line of sight to 100 m with a documented 6 dB obstruction allowance. The comparison isolates the distance penalty from the obstruction penalty.

    Point-to-point antenna choice

    Two proposed sites use the same radios and directional gains but different path lengths. The resulting received-power difference becomes one input to a separate fade-margin analysis.

    EVIDENCE AND DATA QUALITY

    What to retain with the exported result

    Retain transmitter reference-plane power, cable-loss accounting, frequency, antenna models and orientations, gain patterns, polarization, path geometry, far-field justification, and the measurement or engineering basis for each additional loss.

    LIMITS AND EXCLUSIONS

    Where this physical model stops

    • Both paths are ideal far-field line-of-sight free-space links before entered extra loss.
    • Antenna gains are aligned, polarization matched, and stated at the carrier frequency.
    • Multipath, diffraction, Fresnel obstruction, atmospheric variability, fading, interference, and receiver noise are not solved.
    • Extra losses are deterministic user inputs rather than predictions.
    • The result is not a regulatory EIRP check, coverage guarantee, or safety assessment.

    TERMS USED HERE

    Six terms that keep the calculation unambiguous

    Friis equation
    Relation between transmit and receive power for an ideal free-space link.
    Free-space path loss
    Apparent link loss caused by spherical spreading and wavelength.
    dBi
    Antenna gain in decibels relative to an isotropic radiator.
    dBm
    Power level in decibels relative to one milliwatt.
    Far field
    Region where angular field pattern and wave impedance have settled.
    Link margin
    Received power above the receiver requirement after all allowances.

    RELIABLE SOURCES

    References supporting the equation and units

    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

    Questions specific to this calculation

    Why does higher frequency increase FSPL here?

    The equation holds antenna gains in dBi fixed; wavelength becomes shorter while geometric capture relative to isotropic changes.

    Can I use a distance of zero?

    No. Friis contains 1/r^2 and has no valid zero-distance link.

    Where do cable losses go?

    Include them in the appropriate extra-loss entry unless transmit power and received reference planes already exclude them.

    Does this account for walls or trees?

    Only through a defensible user-entered extra loss; the page does not predict obstruction loss.

    Is received dBm enough to decide whether a link works?

    No. Compare it with sensitivity and required SNR, then include fading, interference, and availability margin.

    What does a B/A ratio of one mean?

    The calculated received powers are equal; this occurs for identical budgets or offsetting distance, gain, and loss changes.

    IMPORTANT BOUNDARY

    Use the result as analysis, not certification

    This ideal link comparison is not a coverage prediction, licensed-system design, interference study, compliance filing, or operational availability guarantee.